logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.16 2012가합62849
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant E (E, hereinafter “Defendant E”)

Corporation D (hereinafter “D”) established under the Banking Act as a corporation established in the Belgium.

corporation F (hereinafter referred to as “F”) while holding 51.02% of its shares;

Defendant G [hereinafter referred to as “Defendant G”)]

'The 'GP' is a limited partnership company 'Y' (hereinafter referred to as 'GP') established under the laws of the State of Deteawa and invested by the U.S. investors as limited partners.

Only the unlimited liability is unlimited and the rest part of the LP(hereinafter referred to as “LP”).

(1) Each partner is an entity’s legal concept under the Anglo-American legal system that only takes limited liability within the scope of shares. In general, the general partner has expertise in managing the fund and executes the daily business of the fund and unlimited liability for partnership activities, while the limited partner is liable only within the investment limit with respect to investment risks arising from partnership’s investment activities as a passive investor that does not actively participate in the management of the fund, whereas the limited partner is liable only within the investment limit (hereinafter “H”).

(i) I, hereinafter referred to as “I”);

J (hereinafter referred to as “J”) which controls Defendant E by successively controlling Defendant E.

Defendant K (K; hereinafter “Defendant K”) is a limited partner (L.P.) and Defendant K.

Defendant G’s voting right is an executive member with 100% of the voting right and Defendant L (L; hereinafter “Defendant L”).

Defendant K’s voting right is a managing member with 100% of the voting right, and Defendant M (M; hereinafter “Defendant M”).

(1) The Defendant L’s representative director is the Defendant L’s 1st executive officer, and the relationship between the Defendant and the 1st executive officer of the 3rd executive officer of the 3rd executive officer of the 3rd executive officer of the 100 G G of the 5st executive officer of the 5st executive officer of the 5th JH, 10% of the 6th executive officer of the 6th 7th executive officer of the 7rd executive officer of the 7th E, Defendant N (hereinafter “Defendant N”), Defendant N (hereinafter “Defendant N”), Defendant O, and hereinafter “DefendantO”).

arrow