Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (injury to Group, Deadly Weapons, etc.);
A. At around 01:30 on July 17, 2012, the Defendant requested the victim E (Nam, 29 years of age), who is the owner of the above main shop, to bring about a disturbance, such as a fright, within three rooms of “Dju” located in the Busan Yagu, Busan Yagu, to drink the fright, and to talk with the Defendant and the Defendant, for the purpose that the victim E (Nam, 29 years of age) who is the owner of the above main shop in the room, makes the victim’s right part of the victim’s right part of the victim’s flick with the flicker’s body, flicking the beer’s body and cutting the beer’s flick, and flick the beer’s body.
B. In order for the Defendant to listen to the sound of the Defendant at the same time and at the same place as above, and to control the threat of E, the Defendant F (mainam and 30 years of age) followed by the Defendant, etc., sent back to the Defendant, etc., thereby threatening the Defendant’s head’s body with a shoulderer’s wound, and continuously put the said shoulderer’s body into the Defendant’s hand, and continuously put the Defendant’s hand back to the Defendant’s hand and the Defendant’s body.
Accordingly, the Defendant displayed a shoulder beer's disease, which is a dangerous object as above, and put the victim E on the part of the so-called so-called "hacker's neck, for which the number of treatment days cannot be known", and the victim F, who requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.
2. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim E by force, such as: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and at a place as mentioned in the foregoing preceding paragraph, breaking the beer and the beer of the beer and the beer of the beer and the beer of the beer and the beer of the beer of the beer and the beer of the beer and the assault of other customers; and (b) the Defendant, by force, interfered with the victim E’s main business.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;