A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) on April 17, 2018, at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu C2, the Defendant brought about a dispute with the Defendant for the reason that the instant multilevel marketing is carried out by the Defendant’s wife D (Woo, 50 years old). B) while engaging in a dispute with the Defendant’s wife, “I would not be capable of doing any work, I would go to the vice-office,” and the Defendant was the victim of a dangerous object cremation, which was in danger of having been going to go to the Defendant’s house, and the victim, who was getting off the front door of the damage with the first floor, brought about about four dangerous articles such as painting and plastic powder in turn on hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

2. On April 17, 2018, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) received a report that domestic violence occurred at the place specified in paragraph 1; and (b) received a request for opening a door to check the scene of the crime from the police officer of the Daegu Southern Police Station E (43 taxes); (c) the police officer of the Daegu Southern Police Station Emba (50 taxes); and (d) the police officer of G (50) received a request for opening a door to check the scene of the crime;

The court held that “I shall not interfere with the family affairs of South and North, as soon as possible, not open the front door, and produced the children of the Defendant out of the front door,” and made intimidation by 2 knife, which is a dangerous object in the kitchen, (in the case of the front door: about 33 cm in total length, about 20 cm in total length, about 31 cm in total, about 19.5 cm in length, about 19.5 cm in total, and threatening G.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of the case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made in relation to D, F and G;

1. A photograph of the scene of crime;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles 284 and 283 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.