1. The claim of this case is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The ownership transfer registration is completed in the Defendant’s future on the ground that ownership on the registry of land related to the instant case (i) ownership is owned on the registry of land related to the instant case (i) ownership is the same as the administrative district of all the land appearing in the instant case, and thus, the indication is omitted in the future) and C large 223 square meters are attributed to the right on September 11, 1948, respectively.

(2) Before the merger, the Plaintiff’s spouse’s transfer registration was completed in F (G) as the Plaintiff’s spouse on the grounds of the transaction as of March 3, 1980, 53 square meters in D large scale and E large scale 179 square meters on the grounds of the transaction as of March 3, 1980, and was merged into D large scale 232 square meters on May 15, 2008.

B. (1) The Plaintiff owns a building not registered for residence (hereinafter “instant building”) on the ground (hereinafter “instant land occupation”) and owns a building not registered for residence on the ground of the attached Form No. 13, 14, 232, and 13 square meters (hereinafter “the instant building”) in sequence, which connects each point of (1) part of (27 square meters in the ship, and 13, 14, 232, and 13 square meters in the attached Form No. 223 square meters in C, among the areas of land No. 330 square meters in B forest and field No. 330 square meters, and owns the land occupied in the instant case.

(2) The Plaintiff newly constructed each pipe structure prefabricatedd panel structure, structural roof, single-story detached house on the ground of 232 square meters on which the ownership transfer registration is made in F, and completed the registration of ownership preservation in F on July 22, 2008.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1-1, 2, and 3-1, 2, 4, and 5-2, and appraiser H's entrustment of appraisal

2. On March 3, 1980, the Plaintiff, as to the cause of the claim, purchased the instant land and the instant building on the said land from I, by mistake, and received the registration of ownership transfer under the name of F, the spouse, as to each of the said lands, because the land occupied in this case was 53 square meters or 179 square meters prior to the annexation. However, the Plaintiff asserts that the prescriptive acquisition of the instant land was completed by occupying the instant land in a peaceful and openly owned manner from that time to that time.