Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Similar Receiving Acts at the Busan District Court on January 26, 201, and the execution of the sentence was completed on December 3, 2012 at the Tong Young-gu detention center. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on February 21, 2015 to imprisonment without prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Daegu District Court on February 21, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on the 29th

【Defendant A” is the representative director of G in Daegu-gu, Dong-gu, and Defendant B is the person registered as the representative director of the above company. The above company is a juristic person established to attract investors and receive similar amounts. The company does not engage in the category of comprehensive distribution distribution sales business, real estate consulting business, etc. actually registered, Defendant A is the president of the above company and has overall control over the business such as investor recruitment and investment explanation, payment of profits, management of the company. Defendant B is willing to develop a plan to pay a certain amount under the name of principal and profits every day until the amount reaches 120% of the principal amount of investment, while taking charge of marketing franchise preparation, investor recruitment and investment explanation, management of the company.

1. Accordingly, on March 15, 2012, the Defendants are guaranteed to the victim H in the G office located in the Daegu-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Seoul-gu Office that

If investments are made in our company, it was false that it will guarantee the principal and guarantee the profit equivalent to twice the investment amount within one year.

However, in fact, the above company established by the defendants did not have any substance and did not run any business, and the investment amount received from the injured parties was expected to be used as earnings to other investors and the expenses for the maintenance of the company's office, so even if they receive money from the injured parties as investments.