logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.01.12 2016고단2079
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Even if the defendant is supplied with goods on credit from the victims, he/she did not have any intention or ability to pay the credit amount.

1. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant: (a) paid part of the “D” office operated by the Defendant in Suwon-gu, Busan; (b) obtained the victim’s “F” and the first transaction amount at the time of the victim’s operation to trust, and subsequently made a transaction with the victim again; and (c) did not have the intent or ability to pay the price again with the victim; (d) obtained the Defendant’s employees G by telephone to the effect that the Defendant would pay the price for the red powder as well as the existing credit debt if the Defendant supplied the Defendant to the victim on credit; and (e) obtained the payment from the victim on or around November 5, 2015 and on December 10, 2007 at the market price of KRW 13,60,000.

2. On February 1, 2016, the Defendant, at the office of “I” in the office of the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant located in Seoan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant, while conducting the first transaction with the “K” company in the operation of the victim J, paid a part of the transaction amount; and (b) even if the Defendant had the victim trusted the Defendant and received the food materials continuously from the victim, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost thereof; and (c) the Defendant, from around the 18th day of the same month, made the victim false statement stating

3. From the day of July, 17, the person obtained a total sum of KRW 131,270,000 from the food materials, such as molds, and acquired it by fraud.

3. On February 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the office of “I”; and (b) at the end of March, 2016, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the price to the victim, even if he/she had the victim trusted the Defendant at the time of the first transaction with “M Co., Ltd., Ltd., which was operated by the Victim; and (c) had the victim do so again with the victim.

arrow