logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.15 2018나70035
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim changed before the remand is dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

Reasons

1. The progress of the lawsuit of this case and the subject of the adjudication of this court after remand;

A. 1) The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit, and the Plaintiff primarily claimed that “the Defendant shall implement the procedure for the registration of transfer of ownership on the instant real estate on the ground of the restoration of real name,” and as a preliminary one, that “The Defendant shall: (a) the registration procedure for the cancellation of transfer of ownership on each of the instant real estate; and (b) the said registration procedure for the cancellation of transfer of ownership on August 18, 2005, which was completed by the Suwon District Court No. 39183 (hereinafter “C ownership transfer registration”); and (c) the court of first instance rendered a judgment dismissing both the Plaintiff’s primary claim and the conjunctive claim; and (b) the Plaintiff appealed the judgment of the first instance court as Suwon District Court No. 2017Na64101, Jul. 14, 2017.”

On February 1, 2018, this Court dismissed the appeal against the plaintiff's primary claims, and dismissed the plaintiff's conjunctive claims that have been changed in exchange, and rendered a judgment prior to the remand.

On this issue, the Plaintiff appealed as Supreme Court Decision 2018Da214401.

3. On May 25, 2018, the Plaintiff withdrawn the final appeal against the said C.

In addition, on June 28, 2018, the Supreme Court rendered a judgment to remand the case to the Suwon District Court Panel Division, stating that “The appeal against the primary claim is dismissed, and the part concerning the conjunctive claim is reversed, and that this part of the case is remanded to the Suwon District Court Panel Division.”

B. According to the above legal proceedings of this Court after remand, the plaintiff's primary claim that the appeal was dismissed in the judgment of remand and the appeal was withdrawn in the final appeal against C.

arrow