logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고단2121
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Cost Engines in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the injury) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the injury).

On March 11, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.163% during blood transfusion, and led to the backway of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul), the backway of which is the backway, and the flow at a speed that cannot be known from the backside to the backside of the mountain.

At the time, there are nights and places with frequent traffic of vehicles and pedestrians, and thus, the driver of the vehicle had a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely manipulating the steering and steering system and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was parked in the front bank due to negligence.

D Driving a vehicle continuously without drinking, even though it caused contact accidents in front of the defendant's vehicle, which caused the back part of the driver's vehicle of the defendant.

While the Defendant continued to drive the above vehicle while driving the front side road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and continued to drive the vehicle in front of the vehicle owned by the Victim F (70) and took the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the victim G indictment, which was to avoid it by shocking it due to its shock, is written as “J”, but it is obvious that it is a clerical error.

(n, 22 years old) and the victim H (25 years old) continued to drive a vehicle without drinking, even though they exceeded the ground floor.

Defendant continued to drive the above vehicle at the front side of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and continued to use metal pents and wests managed by the victim's Eunpyeong-gu and installed at the front part of the vehicle of the Defendant in front of the Defendant, with the strings managed by the Eunpyeong-gu Office, and string the above pents, and extracted it from the ground.

Ultimately, the Defendant committed the above occupational negligence with the victim G G 1).

arrow