Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for four months, for two months, and for six months, for Defendant C, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

【Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon method Board on October 19, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 21, 2016. On May 4, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon method Board on May 4, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 4, 2016. Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Suwon method Board on September 2, 2016, and became final and conclusive on September 10, 2016.

Defendant

B On September 2, 2016, upon being sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months for fraud at the Suwon Flag method, the judgment became final and conclusive on September 8, 2016.

Defendant

C A. On December 14, 2016, upon being sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, and on April 27, 2017, the indictment was written on April 19, 2017. However, according to the investigation report (to be attached to the summary information of the judgment and the consolidated case search case, and the list No. 211 of evidence No. 2017 order No. 2011, Apr. 27, 2017), according to the investigation report (the attachment to the summary information of the judgment and the integrated case search case, and the summary information No. 2111 of evidence No.

The judgment became final and conclusive.

[Defendant A’s interference with the exercise of rights by Defendant A’s Defendant 2] On April 5, 2011, the Defendant agreed to borrow KRW 28,400,000 in the purchase price of vehicles from the mutual influent car trading company located in the Daejeon Metropolitan City, and to repay KRW 1,100,00 in installments each month until April 1, 2014 with the loan of KRW 28,40,000 in the cost of purchase of vehicles from the victim’s (the state) from Hyundai Capital to April 1, 201, and set up a collateral security right of KRW 28,40,000 in the said vehicle as security for the said obligation to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant borrowed 10 million won from a name-free bond company at the above date, time, place, and offer and deliver the car as security at the time of mind, thereby concealing the vehicle which became the object of the victim's rights and obstructing the victim's exercise of rights.

The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport shall not have any relation to the fraud of the Defendants (pre-finding - the structure of the crime of fraud of the loan of employee deposit money and the public offering.