1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff asserts that on July 6, 2009, the Plaintiff leased KRW 110 million to the Defendant on December 31, 2009 by setting the due date for payment of KRW 10 million.

As evidence consistent with the plaintiff's assertion, there are evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (money loan contract) as evidence A, and there is no dispute between the parties that the defendant's name next to each of the above documents is based on the defendant's seal imprint.

However, according to the statement of Eul evidence No. 3 and Eul's testimony, it can be recognized that the defendant's father, who is the defendant's father, has affixed the defendant's seal imprint on each of the above documents without the defendant's consent. Thus, Gap evidence No. 1 and No. 2 (money loan contract) cannot be used as evidence, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.