A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Power of crime] The Defendant received a fine of KRW 700,000 from the Seoul Eastern District Court on August 25, 2006 as a crime of violation of road traffic law (dacting driving), and a fine of KRW 1.5 million from the Seoul Central District Court on November 13, 2007 as the same crime.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around 06:30 on June 2, 2018, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.156% during blood transfusions, and the Defendant driven a c stomb golf car at the section of approximately 5km from the subway station located in the New-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jung-gu, Seoul to the roads front of the Seoul Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a golf car with a CWS car.

On June 2, 2018, the Defendant driven a halog car around 06:37, and moved the road in 198 as of Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul to the view of the Korean history museum.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately operating the steering gear and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, like the preceding paragraph, refused a police officer’s alcohol measurement while under the influence of alcohol, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and checking damage, even though he/she was driven by the police officer D, who instructed a stop in front of the direction of the passage while flying, and took up the front part of the Eststyna car managed by the Seoul Franchising Police Officer, and damaged the sum of 1,879,271 won in front of the halog car, which is managed by the Seoul Flachising Police Officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. Statement made D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of the statutes of the response request for appraisal;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2(1)1 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking and the choice of imprisonment) concerning criminal facts, and road traffic law.