1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. On March 3, 1934, the instant land was partitioned into Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

(No. 2 and 12) around 1937, the Plaintiff’s deceased father F (GG) acquired ownership by constructing 34.2 square meters and 28.5 square meters on the land of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do. Around 1950, the Plaintiff acquired ownership by constructing 18 square meters in a livestock shed, 18 square meters in a wood farmhouse, 12 square meters in a wood farm warehouse, and 18 square meters in a wood farmhouse around 1952.

(Evidence Nos. 5 and 6) On April 14, 1995, the Defendant acquired the ownership of the instant land and completed registration of preservation of ownership, and the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the H (Attachment Form 1) in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, the pertinent land (see the attached Form 1) and completed registration of preservation of ownership by acquiring the ownership of a size of 1593 square meters.

The plaintiff and the defendant were clan members of the same clan, the land of this case and H were owned by the clan, and the clan sold to the plaintiff and the defendant who are the members of the clan, and the registration form was governed by the Act on Special Measures for the Registration of Real Estate Ownership.

(A) The Plaintiff inherited the net F, and acquired the ownership of 34.2 square meters and 28.5 square meters and 28.5 square meters and 12 square meters and 18 square meters and 18 square meters and 18 square meters and 18 square meters and 3,21,000 square meters and 3,000 square meters and 3,000 square meters and 12,000 square meters and 12,000 square meters and 3,000 square meters and 12,000 square meters and 471 square meters and 47,000 square meters and 4,000,000 square meters and 12,000 square meters and 12,000 square meters and 2,000 square meters and 2,000 square meters and 3,000 square meters and 3,000 square meters and 2,000 square meters and 3,00.

(Evidence No. 9-11) around 2015, the Plaintiff asserted for the completion of the statute of limitations for the acquisition of possession to the Defendant, and on December 24, 2015, the Defendant, on the instant land, had the Plaintiff’s J on the instant land. As such, the Defendant sent the Plaintiff’s proof of the content that the fee for the use of the instant land is different.