The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (a prison term of three years and six months) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, when the Defendant was assaulted by a person who was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant tried to kill the victim's side knife on the road. The nature of the crime and the method of the crime are very poor. The crime of this case could have lost the victim's life. However, even though it was attempted, the victim could have lost the knife's life.

Even if it is necessary to strictly punish the victim, the degree of injury suffered by the victim due to the crime of this case is not less than that of the victim, and the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

Meanwhile, the circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, that the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case in a somewhat contingent and contingent manner, that the defendant voluntarily reported to 119, that he took relief measures against the victim, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same kind of crime or fine.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 2년 6월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준의 적용 [ 유형의 결정] 살인범죄 > 제 2 유형( 보통 동기 살인) [ 권고 형의 범위] 기본영역, 징역 3년 4월 ~ 10년 8월[ 살인 미수범죄이므로 기수범죄에 대한 양형기준상 형량범위( 징역 10년 ~ 16년) 의 하한을 1/3 로, 상한을 2/3 로 각 감경함] , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고...