The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant, at the request of the police officers from the so-called “report room,” the Defendant, as a misunderstanding of the facts, only up to two female visitors who sing together with customers and singing, did not arrange commercial sex acts. Whether the said police officers are allowed to engage in commercial sex acts with female visitors, and expressing their prices, etc., are merely merely merely giving a mere guidance to those who run a singing room in the neighborhood. Nevertheless, the judgment below convicting the Defendant of the facts charged, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, is erroneous.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Although the lower court also asserted that the Defendant’s assertion of mistake of facts is identical to the grounds for appeal on this part, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged that the Defendant arranged sexual traffic on the basis of evidence, such as the police officers controlling the instant singing, and the testimony of two female visitors from the said singing room.

The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the lower court by comprehensively taking account of the various evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, namely, ① Police officers who control customers by pretending to singing to the instant singing room, by the end of KRW 100,000,000 in the lower court’s court’s “The Defendant is able to have a baby, 20,000 won, and 200,000 won in the face of singing.

“The fact that the Defendant consistently made a statement, ② At the Defendant’s request, female employees J in the above singing room called “60 AC, referring to female employees who are able to engage in sexual traffic,” in the court below’s decision.

It appears that sexual traffic could have been possible between customers and female employees, even if there is no particular intervention by the defendant, and it is other than this.