logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.21 2016고단3250
사기방조등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years;

2. The Defendant shall pay 250,000 won as damages to the applicant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 8, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment for special robbery, etc. at the Seoul High Court, and completed the execution of the said sentence on November 15, 2015.

1. A. The Defendant, along with D, sold goods via the Internet NAV car page “China” website.

In order to obtain money from the victims, the defendant posted false writing on the web site, and D conspired to play a role to keep the defendant by finding money wired by the victims.

In collusion with D, the Defendant posted a letter to sell the electrical cleaning machine and sell the electrical cleaning machine by linking it to the above mid-to long-term national website on February 10, 2016, even though he did not have the intention or ability to sell the electrical cleaning machine and did not intend to receive money from the damaged party under the name of the price of goods, and sent money to E to the victim E who reported it.

D. In other words, the Defendant received a total of KRW 10,657,000 from 28 times, from the time on February 25, 2016, a total of KRW 10,657,00, from 28 times, as indicated in [Attachment] Nos. 1 to 28, 2016, including the receipt of KRW 50,00,00 from the victim’s bank account (G) to the so-called large-called one account.

B. The Defendant, along with H, sold goods via the website of the above Highest Country.

In order to obtain money from victims, the defendant posted false writing on the web site, and H conspireds to play a role to keep the defendant by finding money wired by the victims.

In collusion with H, the Defendant posted a letter stating that “I meal rights” was sold and that I meal rights were sold through a computer installed in a closed place on June 16, 2016, even if the Defendant had no intent or ability to sell “I meal rights” and had expressed the intent to obtain money from the injured party as the price for the goods.

arrow