1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and the plaintiff and the defendant cited this case in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the grounds that the court’s explanation is identical to that of the first instance judgment, in addition to the determination of the following 3 and 4 as to the matters that the plaintiff and the defendant asserted in the trial.

2. The phrase “1. Basic Facts” in two pages of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance shall be added to the phrase “(the date of preparation of evidence A No. 1-3 shall be August 26, 2007 or August 27, 2007, and as seen below, August 27, 2007, on which the date of preparation of evidence A No. 1-3 shall be deemed to be the date of lease)” in seven parallels.

On August 27, 2012, 201, the first instance court’s three pages of the judgment, adding “(the six preparation date of evidence A No. 1-6 shall be September 27, 2012, or the above amount shall be deemed as the lending date of August 27, 2012, which is the date of deposit in the account” (the document No. 2-7 of the document No. 1-6).

On September 20, 201, the first instance court's decision 4 pages 18 "The borrowed money from September 20, 201" is "the borrowed money from August 27, 2012".

3. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The joint and several liability claim between the Plaintiff and B under Article 832 of the Civil Act occurred due to a juristic act committed by B as to daily home affairs by the Defendant’s spouse, and pursuant to Article 832 of the Civil Act, the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with B to pay the Plaintiff the same amount as the claim stated

In full view of the respective entries and arguments in Gap evidence 1-1, 3, 4, 2-2, 2-4, 5, and 9-1 of Gap evidence 1-2, 2-2, 4, 5, and 9-1 of Gap evidence 9-1, the plaintiff paid the loan 10 million won on January 27, 2006, 10 million won on August 27, 2007, and 10 million won on March 31, 2008, to Eul's account other than B; ② although it is recognized that Eul and Eul were the couple at the time of borrowing money from the plaintiff, the plaintiff was paid by the method of remitting the loan 10 million won on March 31, 208, 208, 200 won on the part of Eul evidence 8-4, Eul evidence 8-4, and witness witness E at the trial.