Text
1. As to the franchises listed in [Attachment 1] list to the Plaintiff:
A. The defendant Dong is a logistics company.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a manufacturer of ship franchises. Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is a company that has traded as Plaintiff’s Korean sales since 2008.
The Plaintiff entered in the separate sheet with Defendant B for three lease contracts (hereinafter “each lease contract of this case”): The first lease contract (hereinafter “the first lease contract of this case”): The Plaintiff’s lessee (hereinafter “B”): The date of conclusion of the contract: the name of the lease on February 17, 2009: DY270 (Attached No. 1; hereinafter “1 franchise of this case”): 1 goods: New products, USD 17,000, and 24 months: the lease period.
3. 1) Ownership of leased property is owned by A during the lease period. B is not entitled to full use of leased property, but may not engage in the sale and purchase of leased property, the transfer of leased property, the creation of a security right to leased property, and any other conduct that infringes on A’s ownership.
3) A lessee company (hereinafter “A”)
Plaintiff 1) : Plaintiff lessee (hereinafter “B”).
Defendant B contract number: On April 1, 2009, the name of the leased article: DY150 (C162) (Attached Table 2; hereinafter referred to as “2 franchise of this case”). The name of the leased article on April 8, 2009: DY150 (C162);
(b) Quantity: 1 goods condition: New products, and USD 13,500 monthly rent: 24 months (not later than 24 months);
3. The ownership of the leased article is owned to A for a lease period of one lease.
B has full authority to use leased objects, or the creation of security rights to leased objects, such as the sale, transfer and lease of leased objects.