logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.28 2013나33668
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s ruling is as stated in the main sentence of Article 402 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for adding or adding the following matters to the pertinent part, thereby citing it as it is.

The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection to the enforcement of the Plaintiff on July 8, 2013. The Plaintiff’s immediate appeal against it was defective, and the appellate court sent the case to the Supreme Court by selecting the Plaintiff as a special appeal. The Supreme Court tried on April 25, 2014 and dismissed the Plaintiff’s special appeal.”

B. Part 5, 10 to 12 of the 5th page 5, stating that the plaintiff asserted to the effect, but all of the objections against execution and special appeals against the decision of revocation of this case were dismissed. As seen earlier, the decision of revocation of this case is valid.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed in its entirety. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow