beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A From October 2010, a person operating “F” (former G), which is an agency for the transfer and acquisition of a construction business license from around October 201, and Defendant B is a person operating “H”, which is a agency for the transfer and acquisition of a construction business license from around March 201, and Defendant C is an unregistered credit service provider.
On the other hand, I is a person operating the construction business chain, such as the tail and waterproof, and K is a person operating the construction business chain, such as housing construction.
1. Defendant A and B
(a) A person who intends to engage in credit business in violation of the Act on Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users shall register the relevant place of business with the Special Metropolitan City Mayor, Metropolitan City Mayors, or Do Governors having jurisdiction over the relevant place of business, and, if a unregistered credit service provider grants a loan, the interest rate shall
Nevertheless, the Defendants, in collusion with the previous owners of money in the name of the Defendants, shall make a decision to receive interest at a high rate in return for lending the money to a small business operator who needs to maintain the average balance required for corporate diagnosis, etc., by making a lump sum payment of the money to receive a balance certificate. On March 15, 2012, the Defendants loaned KRW 200 million for corporate establishment funds to I who requires the average balance for the purpose of corporate diagnosis and corporate diagnosis and received KRW 200,000 per day interest (365% per annum), and borrowed KRW 20,000,000 won for maintaining the average balance at the same place on the same day on the 22th day of the same month, and received KRW 40,000 per annum (24% per annum), and borrowed KRW 500,000,000 per annum interest on May 29, 2012, and received KRW 100,000,000 per annum 30,000.
(24% per annum) The Defendants, in collusion with the prior owner of the name, operated the credit business without being registered with the competent authority, and violated the restriction on the interest rate.
(b).