logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.08.23 2018고단762
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes against victims C;

A. On June 2008, the Defendant, around June 2008, will inform the victim of the situation where the investment project in progress is in progress.

Public officials are trying to purchase land that is likely to be invested in purchasing land in the deep sea, and 20 million won was entered as entertainment expenses, and it is bad because it is the mechanism.

Lastly, Mad, Mad, ma, and mad, mad, and, as a side, mad in a false manner.

However, the defendant was only a plan to use the existing loan in repayment, and there was no investment plan as stated by the victim, so even if he received money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to use it for investment purpose or to repay the principal after paying the money.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 12 million from the victim, and acquired the money from the victim with an exemption of KRW 8 million from interest on the money borrowed before the victim.

B. Around June 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “around June 2012, the Defendant borrowed money that is short of the full-time loan” to the victim.

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he only planned to use the money for the repayment of the existing loan, and he did not have any intention or ability to use it for the purpose of the deposit fund or to repay the principal after it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 27 million won from the victim by transfer.

(c)

around July 2012, the Defendant committed a crime on July 2012: “The Defendant lacks money to pay taxes to the victim in the form of money lent by the mother.”

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he only planned to use the money for the repayment of the existing loan, and he did not have any intention or ability to use it for the purpose of tax payment or to repay the principal after it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and thereby, 50 million won from the victim.

arrow