logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.02.07 2016누63684
사설봉안시설 설치신고 거부처분 취소의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "service result" of the third last act of the judgment of the court of first instance is as "service result"; the 5th, 10, and 16th and 17th of the 17th, as "a plane plan"; the 7th, "the result of the mid- and long-term supply and demand plan for funeral facilities in the 12th, 14-9, 11-13, 16, 18-1-4" of the 12th, 14-9, 11-13, 16, 18-1-4, 18-1-4, 13-16, 18-1-4, 13-19, and 20th of the 16th, as "a ground plan"; the 14th, 20th and 5th of the 14th of the 12th of the 12th of the 14th of the 2th judgment as "the first instance court".

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow