The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On September 17, 2013, the facts charged in the instant case are as follows: (a) around 20:30 on September 17, 2013, the Defendant used a cG electronic distance in front of the cG apartment in the atmosphere of the vehicle; and (b) in front of the Si-type Library, the Defendant d (the age of 40) expressed a bath to the victim, and committed assault, such as flicking and

However, this is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Code. According to the agreement submitted by the defendant, the victim has expressed his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant on February 22, 2014, which is after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.