logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2016.11.10 2016가단3469
확정판결금
Text

1. The defendant shall be the successor intervenor:

(a) KRW 9,679,158;

B. As regards KRW 391,609,395 and KRW 179,060,139 among them,

Reasons

In fact, a good mutual savings bank (hereinafter referred to as "deposit bank") has leased the following loans to the Defendant:

On June 28, 1995, 150,000, annual 22% per annum 22% per annum on June 28, 1999, June 28, 1999, and 25% per annum on a discount bill 500,000,000,000 on April 18, 1996, and 225% per annum 225% per annum on April 17, 1997, the savings bank was decided against the defendant by the Sungwon District Court Branch Branch on August 31, 2005, and this judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

The defendant shall pay to savings banks the amount of KRW 45,654,616 (the interest on the lending), KRW 432,787,695 (the sum of the principal and interest on the lending amount of KRW 181,217,284 and KRW 251,570,411) and the amount of KRW 181,217,284 calculated by the rate of 25% per annum from September 27, 2001 to the date of full payment (refusal damages).

As of September 22, 2015, among the above judgment amounts, the sum of the interest amount of the above-mentioned loan amount of KRW 9,679,158, and the interest amount of KRW 179,060,039 and interest amount of KRW 212,549,256 is not paid.

The Savings Bank was declared bankrupt on July 26, 2007 by Suwon District Court 2007Hahap7, and the plaintiff is the trustee in bankruptcy of Savings Bank.

On December 10, 2015, the Plaintiff transferred the above judgment claim to the succeeding intervenor, and notified the Defendant of the fact around that time.

[Ground for recognition] The defendant is obligated to pay to the succeeding intervenor the amount of KRW 9,679,158 (the interest on the above lending) and KRW 391,609,395 (the sum of KRW 179,060,039 and interest KRW 212,549,256) and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 25% per annum pursuant to the agreement from September 23, 2015 to the date of full payment.

The plaintiff asserted that the defendant is liable to pay the unpaid claim out of the judgment amount to the plaintiff, but the plaintiff transferred the above judgment amount to the succeeding intervenor.

arrow