Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
The accused is a person who is engaged in driving a bicycle.
On May 12, 2014, the Defendant, around 15:45, proceeded at a speed of 20 km from the sloping road of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at a speed of 20 km to the sloping-do from the sloping road.
In such a case, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to drive safely, such as checking whether there is a pedestrian or not, and reducing speed, because he or she had a luminous walking along the front door and the right and the right and the right and the right are well examined.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and found the victim C (the age of 75) late to walk together with D, and did not properly operate the brake system, thereby receiving the victim and the above D's body as the above bicycle.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as blood transfusion under the part of the external booming light, which requires approximately eight weeks medical treatment.
However, the facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the written agreement between the defendant and the victim bound in the trial records, the victim may clearly state his/her intention not to prosecute the defendant on September 24, 2014, which is after filing the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.