1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

A. Of the real estate listed in paragraph 1 of the attached Table 1, the number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.

A. In a case where the agreed difference between the actual rent and the substantial rent at the time of unjust enrichment, the actual rent should be regarded as unjust enrichment.

(B) With respect to the instant case, there is no dispute between the parties as to the monthly rent of 9Da60535, June 1, 2001 and 2,000. Meanwhile, according to the appraiser D’s appraisal, monthly rent of 3,236,00 won or more for the period from July 5, 201 to July 4, 200. The rent of 3,236,00 won for the period from July 5, 201 to 30.36, 207. 7. 8, 200 to July 5, 200, 306 to 40. 7. 7. 7. 8, 207, the rent of 206 to 40. 7. 86, 207, 207. 7. 8, 209 to 4. 7. 7, 207, 207. 7.

B. On January 3, 2007, the Defendant entered into a renewal contract with the Plaintiff on or around January 3, 2007, and agreed to newly pay KRW 50,000,000 of the lease deposit instead of raising the monthly rent. Accordingly, since the Plaintiff paid KRW 50,00,000 to the Plaintiff, the Defendant’s defense should be deducted from the amount of unjust enrichment.