logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.11.11 2014고정544
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a general game room with the trade name of “C” in B at a leisure time.

No one shall provide, exhibit or keep game products with the content different from the game products rated for the distribution or use thereof.

Nevertheless, the defendant from February 11, 2014 to the same year.

3. Until December 13, 198, a 20 game product was set up, which was a 20-day-longer, which was deliberated by the Game Management Committee in the above C Game site (Jungungdooaker,CC-N-13011-002).

The above game work appeared at the background screen of the game, and it was deliberated on the appearance of an unrelated image, which does not affect the example or any other game progress, but provided an unspecified number of customers who found the game contents different from the rating in the way of making it example after a tent image of six times prior to the entry of the winning section of the game work appeared at the time of the game work, and the game contents different from the rating in the way of winning the above game site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. The list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation to attach letters of result of enforcement support;

1. Relevant Article of facts constituting a crime and subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment and Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 and 2 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. Taking into account the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the reason for sentencing of the provisional payment order, the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, the defendant does not directly alter the game product, and the seized game machine is confiscated.

arrow