The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

As to the facts stated in each of paragraphs 2 through 7 in the annexed sheet of crime (hereinafter referred to as "crime list") as stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant did not have any false awareness because there was a substantial reason to believe that the facts were true or true from the defendant's position.

B. There was no purpose of slandering the defendant.

The punishment of the court below (2 million won) which is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

Judgment

According to the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s judgment as to the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal doctrine and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the lower court, each of the facts alleged in No. 2 through No. 7 of the crime sight table appears to be false, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that each of the above facts was false at least the dolusence of the fact that the Defendant

The decision is judged.

① (Article 2 of the List of Offenses) The Defendant marks the Defendant’s official seal on a postal item with regard to paragraph 2 of the List of Offenses at the police office, since the Defendant did not affix the official seal on the postal item at the management office.

(f) a statement.

However, the above postal item was received under normal conditions at the D Apartment Management Office, and the official seal affixed thereto is not forged or affixed without authority.

2. (No. 3 of the List of Offenses) In general, a person who violates the law if the term “amount of penalty and penalty” is “amount of penalty and penalty.”

Judgment

money to be paid by such sanction or penalty.

In this regard, the victim did not have a fine or penalty surcharge to be paid by the time of the act of this case [Provided, That on August 8, 2017, the victim was issued a summary order (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 2017 High Court Decision 16035) due to the crime of property damage, etc., and a request for formal trial has not been finalized until now (Seoul Central District Court Decision 2018No1200)] (3) The victim is the representative meeting of the occupants.