logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.07.07 2017고정383
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a vehicle in CM520.

On October 13, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:10 on October 13, 2016, and led the 158 Olympic Park intersection from the 2nd section of the Olympic Park to the 3rd section of the 2nd section of the Olympic Park at a speed of about 70km each other at a speed of about 70km each other.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, in such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed to the person engaged in driving the vehicle, to check whether there is a vehicle driving around the intersection and the intersection by properly examining the traffic conditions on the front side and the right side, and to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected that the vehicle driving signal was changed to the stop signal, and neglected to do so, and neglected to do so, caused the victim D(S. 47 years old) driving E in the direction of the right edge of the car, which was turned back from the off of the Olympic Sweet to the left-hand distance from the front side of the car at the right edge of the car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A survey report on actual conditions, drug map on the scene of an accident, and photographs on the scene of an accident;

1. Medical certificate (D) (A) asserts to the effect that the defendant did not violate the signal by entering the intersection through which he was directly under his control. However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., the defendant entered the intersection of direct Jin Ho, and changed to a yellow signal during his process, when he was investigated by the prosecutor.

written statement;

arrow