beta
Text
1. The defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff)'s appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The facts of recognition Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 9 (including each number, and the defendant means Gap evidence No. 4-1 to 10 (each work confirmation; hereinafter collectively referred to as "the work confirmation of this case").
However, according to the evidence Nos. 6 and 9 of this case, it is recognized that the work confirmation of this case was prepared by C, who is the title holder of the work confirmation of this case. Thus, the defendant's defense of forgery is without merit, and on the other hand, the defendant's assertion that C did not have the right to prepare the work confirmation of this case or that the work confirmation of this case was prepared retroactively. According to the evidence Nos. 6 and 9 of this case, C received the plaintiff's request during the lawsuit of this case even though it was not the site manager at the time of execution of each work confirmation related to the work of this case, although C was not the site manager at the time of execution of each work related to the work confirmation of this case, it is recognized that it was signed and signed in the field manager column of the work confirmation of this case, but C was deemed to have been engaged in daily work at the relevant work, and it is deemed to have been a construction machinery, etc. at the relevant work (hereinafter "construction equipment").
(A) Each description of the instant work confirmation in the purport of confirming the input of the Plaintiff, and the instant work confirmation, in the sense of confirming such fact, appears to be admissible as evidence to support the Plaintiff’s input of the Plaintiff’s construction equipment into the D Elementary School, E Elementary School, and F, and the Plaintiff’s testimony in the first instance trial G of witness G, respectively, in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings.
The Plaintiff is a person operating a construction equipment leasing business under the trade name of “H,” and the Defendant is a construction business entity, such as water supply and drainage facilities.
B. The Plaintiff’s request from January 10, 2013 to March 31, 2015.