Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, Defendant B imprisonment for six months, and Defendant C for a fine of one million won, respectively.

Defendant .

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants conspired from around 00:00 on December 27, 2014 to around 00:40 on the same day to talk with the “G cafeteria restaurant for the operation of the Victim F in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si,” and the Defendants heard the horses from the above victims that “any other customers have,” and Defendant A was responsible for the said victims, “I will see the police, see the police, and read, “I will see,” and Defendant B will take the bath to the said victims, and Defendant C will take the bath to the said victims, and Defendant C would have been unable to serve in the future, and will interfere with the operation of the 40 minutes cafeteria by doing so.”

2. 피고인 A, B의 공동범행 피고인들은 2014. 12. 27. 00:40경 제1항 기재 식당에서, 공모하여 식당 주인으로부터 112 신고전화를 받고 출동한 김포경찰서 H파출소 소속 경찰관 I로부터 소란행위를 제지당하자 피고인 A은 위 I에게 ‘씨팔 짭새, 니들 왜 업주편만 들어’라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 위 I의 가슴 부위를 수회 밀면서 멱살을 잡고, 피고인 B은 손으로 위 I의 어깨를 잡아 밀어 넘어뜨려 폭행함으로써 경찰공무원의 112 신고사건 처리에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B and C’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of the witness I, and part of the witness C’s legal statement;

1. A statement of F and J;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. The Defendants of pertinent legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 314(1) and 30 (Interference with Duties) of the Criminal Act; Articles 314(1) and 30 (Interference with Duties) of the Criminal Act; Articles 136(1) and 30 (Selection of Imprisonment with Labor) of the Criminal Act as to Defendant A and B; and Articles 136(1) and 30 (Appointment of

2. A and B of the aggravated concurrent crimes: The former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1) of the Criminal Act.