Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: Around December 2, 2015, the Defendant appears to have interest in the city.
B. In the “C Hop”, while drinking alcohol on their own and on their tables, a dispute was brought about on the ground that the same would have been brought about with the victim D.
Accordingly, the Defendant committed assault before the head of the above heading house, such as flabing the ebbbbbage in front of the heading house, destroying the floor beyond the floor, and making the face of the victim a drinking.
2. Determination and conclusion
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act;
B. Indication of the victim’s non-existence of punishment after the prosecution of the instant case
(c) Dismissal of public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;