A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 17, 2015, at around 23:10, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewing” at the “E” singing room for the victim of the 1st underground floor of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and opened the visits of 6,7, and 8 visitors, with the intention of having other customers visit 6,7, and the customer “I am the gue, I am the gue, I am the gue, I am. I am the gue, I am. I am the gue, I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am b3:30 on the same day, and interfered with the victim’s singing room business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV image submission case);

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Sentencing (Scope of Recommendation) and category 1 (Interference with Business) (1 to 8 months) (2) (2) (2) (2) (3) (3) (3) (4) (3) (3) (4 (2) (4) (3) and (4);

2. In addition to the previous conviction of a fine as a result of the crime of interference with business in 2012 and 2015, the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime despite several times of violence and narcotics, the Defendant committed the instant crime at a disadvantage to the Defendant: Provided, That the punishment shall be determined by taking into account all factors of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, character and conduct, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the commission of the instant crime.