A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On 22:50 on 27:206. 27. 22:50, the Defendant heard from the victim the phrase “building completion and building dispute” that the victim d(58 years old) and drinking alcohol in the “C” restaurant in Gwangju-si, and tried to look at the victim’s “construction completion and building dispute”, which is a dangerous article on the table, and added two heats where the number of days of treatment cannot be known because the victim d's d'(58 years old) and d'C were laid down on the back head of the body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning reports on the occurrence of an injury and photographs attached thereto;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [Determination of types] of violent crimes: Special injury [Type 1] Special injury (special person in a form of punishment] - mitigated elements: In cases of reduction of punishment (including serious efforts to recover damage) or considerable damage, [the scope of the recommended sentence and the scope of the recommended sentence] mitigation area, imprisonment for four months to one year [the scope of the recommended sentence revised according to the sentencing guidelines] from six months to one year (the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines is in conflict with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range, so the minimum limit of the applicable sentencing range is set by law); and

2. The decision-making defendant has a majority of the criminal records of the same kind, and the crime of this case is likely to cause the victim's hair by issuing the instant cups with water and thus, it is highly dangerous.

However, considering the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and reflects it, and that the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant by agreement with the victim.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime of this case, various circumstances shown in pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime, and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines, etc. shall be determined within the scope of discretionary mitigation and the same as the order.