logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2018.09.14 2018고단402
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a holder of a car in XG due to C's franchise.

No person shall operate any vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, on November 20, 2017, the Defendant operated C that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the 10m section of the front road of Gangseo-si, Gangseo-si, 2017 and operated XG car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against E;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. Application of the motor vehicle driver's license ledger and mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The part concerning dismissal of public prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention in a workhouse

1. The Defendant is the actual owner of a XG car and is engaged in driving of the said car.

On November 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the said vehicle that was parked on the front road of Gangseo-gu, 21:48.

At that time, since there was a congested situation due to traffic vehicles and pedestrians, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to look at the front side and right side of the motor vehicle well, and to start safely by accurately manipulatinging the steering gear, steering gear, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected it and caused the damage during the operation of E, and the part on the left side of the F-A-hurged vehicle owned by the F-hurging Bank Co., Ltd., which was the F-hurging Bank Co., Ltd. was charged with repair costs equivalent to KRW 402,578.

Ultimately, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by occupational negligence above.

2. This part of the facts charged is an offense falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On August 23, 2018, which was bound to the public trial records.

arrow