The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court maintained by the lower court, the lower court’s judgment, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, has no admissibility of narcotic appraisal and seizure protocol as unlawful.

In rejecting the Defendant’s assertion that there is no credibility, it is justifiable to find the Defendant guilty of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. among the facts charged in the instant case. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

Meanwhile, the Defendant appealed to the remaining guilty portion of the judgment below, but there is no indication of the grounds for appeal in the petition of appeal and no statement of the grounds for appeal is found in the appellate brief.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.