logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.10.19 2016가단124825
사해행위취소
Text

1. All of the instant lawsuits are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 20, 2016, the Plaintiffs entered into a sale and purchase contract of ginseng (hereinafter “instant purchase and sale”) between F and F, which would trade the ginseng of Gyeonggi-gun D and E on the ground of Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “the ginseng of this case”) at KRW 70,00,000 (one column and KRW 35,000), and entered into a sale and purchase contract of ginseng (hereinafter “the ginseng of this case”). The down payment shall be paid on the date of the contract, and the remainder shall be paid on June 20, 2016, and the balance shall be paid after the inspection of ginseng varieties on June 20, 201, and the F will be responsible for the management of the said ginseng, and after the payment of the remainder, the Plaintiffs agreed that the said ginseng would be responsible for its management.

B. On June 30, 2016, F Co., Ltd. issued a promissory note in the amount of KRW 63,050,000 at face value to the Defendant, and on the same day, a notary public delayed the payment of the said note from the Multiurury Law Firm on the same day, the F Co., Ltd. prepared a notarized deed (Evidence No. 865, 2016) recognizing that there is no objection even if he/she is immediately subject to compulsory execution, and delivered it to the Defendant.

C. The Defendant’s seizure of some of the instant ginseng sales proceeds 1) Korea Ginseng Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Ginseng Corporation”)

B) Before the instant sales contract was concluded, the ginseng sales contract was concluded between F and F to be supplied with the ginseng of this case (hereinafter “instant purchase contract”).

A) This appears to be a kind of so-called contract cultivation stipulated under Article 10 of the Ginseng Industry Act. (2) The Defendant applied for the seizure and assignment order of the purchase price claim against the Gyeonggi-do Do Do Dazol-gun, 4,754§³ and six-year G miscellaneous land 661m2, which F holds against the Korea Ginseng Corporation with the claim for the said promissory note gold claim at this court, on July 21, 2016, for the attachment and assignment order of the purchase price claim against the 63,087,30m2, out of the above purchase price claim, and received from the court the attachment and assignment order of the above claim. The above claim attachment and assignment order are issued.

arrow