Text
1. The defendant shall name the plaintiff with respect to the portion of 1230/5670 of the share of 2,489 square meters in the previous 2,489 square meters in Leecheon-si, Gyeonggi-do.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) On July 25, 1918, the forest survey division is registered in the Forest Survey Division as it was registered on July 25, 1918 by E with the domicile in the Gyeonggi-do, E on the 2nd 4th Kacheon-si, the forest survey division, etc. (7,380 square meters; hereinafter “instant land”).
(2) The instant land prior to the instant partition was divided into 21,917 square meters of F forest land and 21,917 square meters of G2,489 square meters, and the said G2,489 square meters of land was converted into 2,489 square meters prior to Dongcheon-si, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”).
(3) As to the instant land, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership preservation with the head of Suwon District Court No. 15341, Jun. 13, 1996, on the land of this case.
B. Inheritance Relations (1) The Plaintiff’s prior birth of H on March 1, 1905, died on November 3, 1966 while the Plaintiff reported the marriage with I on March 1, 1905, and there was a wife as the co-inheritors of E, I, the son who succeeded to Australia (adopted by E on June 19, 1942), and the married son.
(2) On August 13, 1942, while the J married with L on July 6, 1961 and married with L, and died on January 5, 198, 198 after the marriage with N, the Plaintiff was the wife N, son, and the Plaintiff.
(3) Thereafter, on May 27, 1989, I died, and after I died from his co-inheritors, K, his wife N, son, and the Plaintiff, who had been the substitute inheritor of the J who had already died.
(4) In other words, M has died on September 26, 2007, and L, his biological mother, solely inherited M.
(5) On January 10, 2007, K died and jointly succeeded to each of its children by O, P, Q, R, S, T, and U.K.
(6) Each inheritance share under the above inheritance relationship is as described in the separate share calculation sheet.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 11, and each fact-finding result of this court's fact-finding on the Leecheon market
2. Determination as to the cause of action
A. The evidence presented prior to the identity of the assessment titleholder and the Plaintiff’s preference.