1. Defendant B, within three (3) days from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, is at the nationwide point of view on the E’s Internet site (F).

Basic Facts

As the representative of G with limited liability company G, the Plaintiff engaged in the vehicle maintenance business with the trade name of “H” in the front city city, and is a person who entered into a contract with the Dong Fire Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Dong Fire”) and the professional service agency (hereinafter “instant agency contract”) and entered into the contract with the professional service agency (hereinafter “instant agency contract”).

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a press organization operating the E online newspaper site (F), and Defendant C is a reporter affiliated with the Defendant, who coverages and prepares articles concerning the instant article as seen below.

Defendant D and I are employees affiliated with “H”, who informed Defendant C of the instant article.

During the period from January 3, 2017 to January 12, 2017, Defendant Company published an article stating that “the Plaintiff was liable for KRW 80 million to Defendant D by means of having Defendant D purchase a vehicle or bear the repair cost of a vehicle due to an accident” (hereinafter “instant article”) on the face of “former North Korea,” such as “J,” etc. among the nationwide online newspaper sites four times in total, and that “the Plaintiff was treated unfairly to Defendant D by deducting the amount from Defendant D’s benefits, such as failing to pay the amount to Defendant D” (hereinafter “instant article”). The details are as shown in attached Forms 3-1 through 3-4.

[Ground of recognition] Defendant Company and C: The facts without dispute, Gap 1, 8 (including each number, if any, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul 8, and 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings as to the defendant D: The summary of the plaintiff's assertion as to the claim against Defendant Company and C (Article 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act) and the plaintiff's assertion as to the claim against the defendant Company and C (hereinafter the "Defendant Company, etc."), and the defendant Company C (hereinafter the two collectively referred to as the "Defendant Company, etc."), in the article of this case, "The plaintiff purchased the towing vehicle owned by the company and belongs to the defendant D while purchasing the towing vehicle, and the purchase cost of the towing vehicle is five.