logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.21 2012고정3368
조세범처벌법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

Defendant

A fails to pay the above fine; 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On May 30, 2012, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of the execution to be sentenced to imprisonment for the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act by the violation of the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Suwon District Court on June 7, 2012, which became final and conclusive on June 7, 2012, and on July 13, 2012, the Suwon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of the execution to be punished by embezzlement on July 21, 2012.

Defendant

A is the representative director of Defendant B, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling plastics for construction.

1. Around October 25, 2007, the Defendant stated in the indictment for the 2nd preliminary return of the value-added tax in the form of the luxian tax book located in the salary-to-be Eup in Sungsung-si in 2007 as the "final return". However, according to the Value-Added Tax Act, it appears to be the "preliminary return". Around January 25, 2008, the Defendant submitted a list of total tax invoices by stating the list of total tax invoices as if he was supplied with the goods equivalent to KRW 448,040,324 from the "the (ju) luxan Industries" without being supplied with the goods or services. Around January 25, 2008, the Defendant submitted a list of total tax invoices by falsely entering the list of total tax invoices in the form of the luxan tax book located in the salary-to-be Eup in 2007 and submitted the list of total tax invoices as if he was supplied with the goods or services.

2. Defendant B, a representative of the Defendant, submitted to the Government a list of total tax invoices in which the false statements of transactions in total amount of KRW 650,667,116 are entered, as described in paragraph (1) above, with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Some police interrogation protocol of the defendant A;

1. A written statement of the defendant A

1. A written accusation, a written report on partial termination of trade order, a report on value-added tax and a list of tax invoices, documents for inspection of sources, full certificate of registered matters, and written decision on a request

1. The defendant A-.

arrow