The defendant is innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the Defendant’s employee violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by operating the said cargo vehicle under the status of 11.02 tons exceeding 10 tons out of the reduced weight of the 2 axis of the said cargo vehicle when he loaded feed at the 1159-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

2. Determination

A. A prosecutor filed a public prosecution against the defendant by applying Articles 86 and 83(1)2 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) with respect to the above facts charged.

B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 1954, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 945, Apr. 1, 2005; Act No. 9765, Mar. 19, 2005)

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.