logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.04 2013누29966
부당노동행위구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance partially rejects the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance or adds the judgment on

Therefore, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachmentd part] The part used for the reasons in the judgment of the court of first instance was established on July 13, 201. B trade union opened a general meeting on December 28, 2012, eight members of the Intervenor’s labor union and decided to continue its trade union activities as part of the Intervenor’s sports branch “B trade union.” The Intervenor’s sports branch decided to employ 4,400 full-time workers as affiliates of the Group C, and D (hereinafter “D”) as follows. Meanwhile, B trade union was established on July 13, 2011 with the organization of C Group and its affiliates, and its employees belonging to the affiliate, and all members of the Intervenor’s labor union were affiliated with the Intervenor’s labor union from around 14, 2013 to around 28, and the Intervenor’s labor union was established with the Defendant’s labor union’s participation in the Plaintiff’s sports branch and the Intervenor’s labor union from around 16th, 2013 to 16.

(1) The Plaintiff’s security service company’s security service company employees (hereinafter “security service employees of service companies”)

The plaintiff's workers are unable to receive printed materials or have fluorted printed materials.

arrow