logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.14 2017고단994
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the month of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act by committing a violation of the Road Traffic Act in a housing site located in the Suwon District Court of Suwon, as of June 2, 2009, and two years of a suspended sentence on October 24, 2012.

On December 9, 2016, the Defendant driven a Eststren motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.076% from the 10k section of approximately 10km from the 00m marg of the wife population to the D shooting distance C at the sibly Man-si from the 19:00 on December 9, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the above provision.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle of rocketing siren.

On December 9, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1, around 19:00, along with two-lanes from the 00am to the two-lane.

At night, the Defendant was the victim F(51) prior to the same direction, and the Defendant was followed by the G rocketing car driven by the victim F(51) in the same direction, and thus, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by taking into account the situation well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this by negligence found that the said rocketing car stops due to the traffic congestion, and found it late, and caused the Defendant’s front part of the Defendant’s vehicle to shock the Defendant’s vehicle back to the front part of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, sustained injury to the victim F, such as catum salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim H (V, 45 years of age) who was accompanied by the victim F’s vehicle in the victim F’s vehicle in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, to the victim I (V, 43 years of age).

arrow