logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.12.10 2015누40127
양도소득세부과처분취소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the part against the defendant in excess of the order to revoke below shall be revoked and that part.

Reasons

1. Determination of “1. Plaintiff’s assertion”, “3. related statutes” and “4. Judgment” from “1. Report of Disposition” to “2. Plaintiff’s assertion” and “4.

(a).

(c).

Before "a port" (from No. 3 to No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance) shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts that vary from the judgment of the first instance court;

E. In calculating the transfer income tax attributed to the Plaintiff in 2011, the Defendant did not recognize the necessary expenses (reconciliation costs of KRW 350 million and litigation costs of KRW 19 million) and the special long-term holding deduction, etc. as seen above, and did not comply with the instant disposition. Therefore, the instant disposition was unlawful.

There is no dispute that the reasonable amount of tax to which the necessary expenses and the special long-term holding deduction, etc. as mentioned above are applied with respect to the scope of revocation does not constitute a fraction of less than ten won under Article 47 (1) of the Management of the National Funds Act of KRW 744,971,30, as shown in the separate sheet of tax base.

Therefore, the part exceeding 74,971,330 won among the disposition of this case should be revoked in an unlawful manner.

3. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be accepted only within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is unfair with a different conclusion, part of the defendant's appeal shall be accepted, and the part against the defendant which exceeds the order to revoke among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation portion shall be dismissed, and the part which exceeds 74,971,330 won among the disposition of this case shall be revoked, and the defendant's remaining appeal shall be dismissed as it

arrow