logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.11.25 2014고단3124
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a Dona-si.

On August 14, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on August 14, 2014, and proceeded at an irregular speed, depending on the first lane of the second two roads in front of the Dongdaemun-gu Post Office located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.

Since there is a crosswalk where signal lights are installed at the front of that place, there was a duty of care to confirm whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who gets on a road by reducing speed and by checking well the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely in accordance with the new subparagraph.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeded without neglecting that the vehicle progress signal is changed to a stop signal, and due to negligence, he is crossing the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals to the right side from the left side of the taxi driving of the Defendant.

The upper part of the FCT 110 Oral Ba of the victim E(31 years old) driving in the direction of the string basin was followed by the front part of the defendant's driver's driver's upper part of the taxi, and the victim exceeded the floor along with the Oral Ba.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s occupational negligence such that the victim suffered from the blood species and the blood ties of both sides, which require approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police statements of E;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The reason for sentencing was that the defendant violated the signal and neglected his duty of care to drive the accident of this case.

arrow