logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.11.28 2014고단734
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, while working as an employee at the mobile phone agency “D” in Andong-si and “F” in Andong-si and Dong-dong-si E, intended to open a new mobile phone in the customer’s name and sell it to others by using the fact that he/she keeps a copy of his/her identification card presented by customers for handling business, such as opening and stopping of a mobile phone.

On May 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) based on the fact that the “D” mobile phone agent located in Ansan-si, the Defendant kept a copy of the identity card of the Victim G who revoked the temporary suspension of the mobile phone in the said agency; (b) stated that “G”, “H”, “H”, “I” in the customer name column of the mobile phone subscription application form; (c) “I” in the address column; (d) “I” in the address column; (d) “I” in the application form; and (e) the applicant column “G” voluntarily signed G on the name following the application form.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the application form for mobile phone subscription in the name of the victim G, which is a private document on the rights and duties, and forged the application form for mobile phone subscription in the name of the victims 11 times from May 7, 2013 to October 25, 2013, as shown in the annexed crime list.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at a place as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1), submitted and used the forged victim G mobile phone entrance application in the name of the victim as described in the foregoing paragraph (1) through a mobile phone agency computer system to the staff in charge of KTT, who knew of the forgery, as well as using the forged victim G mobile phone entrance application form. From May 7, 2013 to October 25, 2013, the Defendant used the forged mobile phone entrance application form in the name of the victims 11 times as shown in the annexed crime list.

3. Fraud;

A. From May 7, 2013 to October 25, 2013, the defrauded Defendant opened a mobile phone in the victim G name, even if he/she opens a mobile phone in the victim G name.

arrow