Text
1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) amounting to KRW 3,000,000, and KRW 500,000, respectively, to Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant A (Counterclaim Defendant).
Reasons
1. The relationship between the parties
A. From around 2002 to June 2012, Plaintiff A held office as the president of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Council for the Representatives of Residents (hereinafter “instant apartment”) and the Defendant was elected as the president of the Council for the Representatives of Residents of the instant apartment around July 2012.
B. Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and C and D are the children of Plaintiff A, and both Plaintiff B and A reside together with Plaintiff A in the instant apartment from 710.
【Ground for recognition】 There is no dispute
2. Determination on the main claim
A. The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million from this court as to the following criminal facts as the crime of defamation by publicly alleging false facts.
On July 22, 2014, the Defendant filed an application for formal trial under this Court 201, but the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,000 on this issue, and the Defendant appealed and appealed, but all of the appeals were dismissed, and the Defendant was found guilty on June 30, 2015.
【The fact that the Defendant was found to have committed a crime, despite the fact that the victim Gap prevented corruption, such as arbitrarily embling the management expenses for apartments with "G", which is an apartment management company, or arbitrarily embling the management expenses for apartments, etc., or he did not pay the management expenses, and walk many management expenses from the occupants, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that, around August 16, 2012, at the meeting of the apartment management office of the instant apartment, the Defendant continued to distribute to the occupants, “the head of the Management Office and the president of the tenant representative meeting” the head of the instant apartment vehicle from the beginning of September 2012 to the police officer, “I, J, K, and L, G, when the representative of the apartment management office of the instant apartment, G, and all other four (I, J, I, and many) are present, and distributed the instant management expenses to the occupants, and the head of the management office of the tenant representative meeting, without proceeding to the occupants or the former part of the management expenses.”