beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution for a violation of the Housing Act, etc. in the Jeonju District Court's Jeonju Branch's Support on April 9, 2013, which became final and conclusive on September 14, 2013. The Defendant, as the representative director of the limited liability company D, has continuously maintained friendship with F, which is the students of E High School, has continuously maintained friendship
1. Around November 201, the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million from I, a former teacher who became aware of in the church through the Defendant’s wife, but did not repay the debt amount of KRW 100 million to the Seocho-gu Saemaul Cooperative, the Defendant was in bad credit standing around 2007, and on October 18, 201, the Defendant purchased KRW 1,127 square meters (No. 341 square meters) in G located in the Jeonbuk-gun-gun, Jeonbuk-gun, the owner H, etc. from the owner H, but failed to pay the purchase price. However, the Defendant borrowed KRW 30 million from I, a former teacher who became aware of in the church through the above F, but failed to repay the money, and the Defendant did not request the victim K to use the money for the purchase of the model model of the apartment house located in the above G apartment, and thus, the Defendant did not intend to use the money for the exclusive purpose of the purchase of the apartment house. Therefore, the Defendant did not have any reason to request the victim K to use the money.
The Defendant, around 19:00 on November 10, 201, issued the order to exclusively take the construction work of N apartment facilities in Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, for the first time, prior to the beginning of the beginning of the year 2012, when the Defendant met the said F and the victim in the “M” restaurant located in Seojin-gu L, Seoul Special Metropolitan City. Furthermore, the Defendant did not have the right to receive orders for the construction work of N apartment facilities in the following N apartment facilities.
This money is transferred to an account in the name of F, because it is non-funds.