The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In order to prevent the Defendant from suffering from misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, the Defendant did not assault the said victim, and the victim F attached the arms of the said victim in order to remove franchising, thereby not assaulting the said victim.

B. The lower court’s sentence of an unreasonable sentencing (700,000 won) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court including the G’s legal statement of the lower court on the assertion of mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles, the Defendant’s act constituted an act of assaulting the victim’s satisfe at one time, and the Defendant’s f, who had observed the batf at the victim C’s store, was pushed down with the victim’s batf, and the f, who was satt the Defendant’s batf, was satt with the Defendant’s batf, and it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s act constituted an act of defense against an unfair attack in light of the

B. Even though the degree of assault on the assertion of unfair sentencing is relatively minor, and there is no circumstance to consider the background of the crime, it is recognized that there was a criminal record sentenced two times to a fine for the same kind of crime prior to the instant case, the lower court did not present any circumstance to change the sentence in the trial, and other various circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing, including the Defendant’s age, occupation, and family relationship, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.