1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is that of the first instance judgment.

(a).

Inasmuch as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

“A. 1) F, G, and H (Plaintiff B’s omission) entered into a partnership agreement with the head of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, on February 6, 2012, which entered into the instant partnership agreement with the head of Si/Gun/Gu to jointly carry out the business of newly building and selling multi-family housing on a 3,306 square meters (the Plaintiff B appears to have been owned at that time) of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, but the same agreement entered into as “3,036 square meters,” but it appears that the agreement entered into as “the instant partnership agreement.”

(2) On February 10, 2012, the Plaintiff Company was established on February 10, 2012 (H was appointed as the representative director).

(2) According to the instant trade agreement, H provided a site and executed, F provided a financing, and G provided a sale of newly-built house, and F provided an investment under the instant trade agreement to the Plaintiff Company.

3. As to the instant real estate on October 15, 2012, the Plaintiff Company:

8.20. Completion of the registration of ownership transfer by reason of sale.

On December 17, 2012, the instant real estate was divided into J 2,090 square meters and K 74 square meters, and on December 28, 2012, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the Plaintiff B’s name on December 21, 2012 with respect to the said K land.

B. After that, the Plaintiff Company newly built a multi-family housing on the I’s land before the said division with the name of the owner as Plaintiff B.

(hereinafter “instant building”).

2. The Plaintiffs asserted that the amount of 300 million won against the Defendant out of the instant dividend table for the following reasons are deleted. The amount of dividends against the Plaintiff Company is KRW 506,116,097, and the amount of dividends against the Plaintiff Company is KRW 11,491,376, respectively.