Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2014, at the court of Busan District Court No. 453, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the insulting case against Defendant C at the above court of Busan District Court No. 453, and responded to the counsel’s question at the time of the instant case at the time of May 1, 2013, “I asked to the extent that I would like to be “I would like to go to the victim E,” and “I would like to answer to the question at the time of the instant case at the time of the instant case,” “I would like to be “I would like to go to the victim E,” and “I would like to answer to the question at the time of the instant case,” “I would like to answer to the question of the counsel “I would like to be “I would you would not have to come to the proper,” and “I would like to answer to the question of the public prosecutor’s “I would like to be “I would like to answer during the time I would like.”

However, at the time of fact, C had ever taken a bath to E, such as “a person’s identity”, and the Defendant returned home immediately before the beginning of the dispute between C and E, and thus did not witness the above site.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each protocol of trial, each protocol of examination of witness, each protocol of judgment (Jinsan District Court 2014Ma43) and each defense counsel asserted that the defendant only made a statement according to his memory and did not have any perjury. However, according to the above evidence, the place where C took a bath to E was in front of the third beginning of the 104 apartment house in front of the third beginning of the 104 apartment house, the defendant was in front of the third beginning of the 104 Dong 104 Dong 101 Dong 103 Dong 103, and the defendant was in front of the third beginning of the 104 Dong 104 Dong 104. Accordingly, the defendant directly conflicts between C and E.